Greenpeace Executive Salary Increase Soars Past Inflation

This entry is part 2 of 7 in the series Greenpeace Executive Compensation

One of the most popular articles here on Telofski.com is the post titled “Greenpeace CEO Makes ‘More’ Than Exxon CEO?” Based on a review of my site’s stats, it seems that many folks like to read about the compensation received by Greenpeace executives and officers. So, give the people what they want, right? Here’s another post about Greenpeace executive compensation.

Background

American non-profit organizations are required to file annually a Form 990 with the Internal Revenue Service. This document is a tax return giving details about the organization’s financial operation. Form 990s are documents open for public review. An organization’s Form 990 for any year may be obtained directly from the IRS, from the organization itself, or via intermediary organizations. One of those intermediaries is Guidestar.org, which catalogues and makes available non-profit organizations’ Form 990s. It was Guidestar that I used to obtain the financial information shown in today’s post. But before we get to the numbers, let’s get some organizational explanations out of the way first.

Greenpeace is essentially comprised of two separate corporations. One is Greenpeace, Inc. which is a 501(c)(4) organization. What does that mean? Let’s allow Wikipedia to explain:

“501(c)(4) organizations are generally civic leagues and other corporations operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, or local associations of employees with membership limited to a designated company or people in a particular municipality or neighborhood, and with net earnings devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes. 501(c)(4) organizations may lobby for legislation, and unlike 501(c)(3) organizations they may also participate in political campaigns and elections, as long as campaigning is not the organization’s primary purpose.”

Greenpeace, Inc. is the well-known, general kibbitzing and protest organization that one usually thinks of when the word “Greenpeace” is mentioned. This is the organization that oversees the folks who climb corporate headquarters buildings, bridges, national monuments, and who dress up as animals and then burst into annual meetings of shareholders.

The other Greenpeace corporation, which is not as well known, is Greenpeace Fund, Inc. This corporation is a 501(c)(3) organization. What does that mean? Again, let’s allow Wikipedia to explain.

“501(c)(3) exemptions apply to corporations, and any community chest, fund, cooperating association or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, to foster national or international amateur sports competition, to promote the arts, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.”

Both (3)’s and (4)’s are income tax-exempt organizations. Contributions to 501(c)(4)’s are not tax deductible for purposes of U.S. income tax, while contributions to 501(c)(3)’s are usually deductible. Consider that the next time you reach into your pocket to support Greenpeace.

Findings

Several of the executives from both Greenpeace, Inc. and Greenpeace Fund, Inc. work for each of the two corporations, drawing an executive salary from each organization. Executive compensation is detailed on Form 990s. I reviewed the Form 990s, obtained via Guidestar.org, for each of the two corporations

Continue reading Greenpeace Executive Salary Increase Soars Past Inflation

Corporate Accountability CEO Makes "More" Than Mickey D CEO?

Back in January of this year, I wrote a post about the compensation differences between the CEO of Greenpeace and the CEO of Exxon Mobil. From the research which was the foundation of the article, I found that, as a percentage of revenue, the Greenpeace CEO makes far more than the Exxon Mobil CEO. You may read that post entitled, “Greenpeace CEO Makes ‘More’ Than Exxon Mobil CEO?” by clicking here. Since it was published, that post has been one of the most popularly read on this blog. And since, on this blog, I like to give readers topics in which they have an interest, today I write a similar article, but this time it’s about two different “competitors.”

In recent weeks and months, Corporate Accountability International (CAI), an irregular competitor, has been very much in the news with their dual objective campaign against Mc Donald’s. Those objective are: (1) to get the company to stop promoting its Happy Meal product through the offer of toy giveaways (this objective is in partnership with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, see here and here) and, (2) to convince Mc Donald’s to retire their corporate icon, Ronald Mc Donald. All this CAI attention toward Mc Donald’s piqued my curiosity about this irregular competitor, CAI. So, in the same vein as the Greenpeace – Exxon Mobil comparison, and in the interest of giving my readership topics in which it has interest, I decided to do some research regarding the CEO compensation of these two adversary organizations. The findings were surprising.

Greenpeace CEO Makes "More" Than Exxon CEO?

This entry is part 1 of 7 in the series Greenpeace Executive Compensation

Does the Greenpeace CEO make more than the Exxon Mobil CEO?

Well, yes and no. In terms of absolute dollars, no. Not even close. But, in terms of a percentage of their respective organization’s revenue, yes. More. Very much more.

In terms of compensation as a percentage of revenue, the Greenpeace CEO pulls in considerably more than does his counterpart at Exxon Mobil.

Recently I performed research addressing this issue. The reason I performed this research was due to activist’s and NGO’s frequent claims that CEOs of multinational corporations (MNCs) take as compensation an unfair proportion of their companies’ overall revenue. After recently hearing this claim again, perhaps for about the 500th time, I wondered, “Who actually makes more in terms of percentage of revenue? Huge multinationals? Or NGOs?” I decided to do some digging, create a comparison, and take a look.

Methodology

Now, to address this question, what I decided to do was just take a “quick and dirty” look. I just wanted to test my theory with some trial research. Therefore, at the outset my intention was not to do an exhaustive study by including a large number of NGOs and MNCs in a representative and statistically controlled sample. When I began this research I decided that I would save that exhaustive study for another occasion should my theory be supported by the results of this “thumbnail” research project.

To commence my pilot research project, I simply selected, very much at random, one NGO and one multinational. The first two of each that came to mind were Greenpeace and Exxon Mobil. These two organizations are often at odds with each other and both are frequently in the news, making them top of mind.

To identify the revenues of Greenpeace I went to Guidestar.org. Guidestar is an organization which aggregates information about non-profit corporations. At their site, you may search for your non-profit of interest and find information you desire, much of it a no charge. One of the pieces of information stored by Guidestar is a non-profit’s US IRS Form 990.

The IRS Form 990 is a document that must be filed by all tax-exempt non-profit organizations operating within the United States. This document is much like a tax return and contains some information similar to what you would find in a for-profit corporation’s annual report or 10K filing. Among the information shown in a Form 990 is annual revenues and executive compensation. On the Guidestar site, I located Greenpeace’s Forms 990.

To obtain the revenue and executive compensation information for Exxon Mobil, I journeyed to SEC.gov, the site of the Securities and Exchange Commission for the United States. At that site, I accessed Exxon Mobil’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement which contained summary compensation figures for Exxon Mobil executives for the years 2006 – 2008. Also available on that site was the Exxon Mobil 10K, containing the annual revenue figures that I sought. Additional information on Exxon Mobil’s revenue was obtained from their 2008 Annual Report available at Continue reading Greenpeace CEO Makes "More" Than Exxon CEO?

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes